Changing customer expectations, technological innovation and evolving regulatory requirements are just some of the lenses through which financial institutions need to consider their approach to customer onboarding/periodic review processes. Additionally, a level of process excellence needs to be achieved to remain competitive and contain operating costs under control. The main cost drivers for anti-money laundering (AML) compliance are labour costs, in particular labour efforts spent on customer onboarding and Know-Your-Customer (“KYC”) activities. Financial regulators continue active supervision of financial institutions and, during the first half of 2020, fines of over USD$5,6 billion have been handed out for AML and sanctions failings[1].
Recent developments
Financial services have not remained immune from technological innovations. Internet banking has served as an access platform for many years, but it was only in the last few years that digital (and digital only) banks have emerged. This has led to new technology developments related to customer onboarding and thus poses a threat to incumbent organisations, which are unable to offer the same ease and convenience in the new customer onboarding process. This became an even more prominent differentiator during the global pandemic. Many organisations have initiated projects to enable remote customer onboarding; however, it has been our experience that this was frequently done in isolation from existing processes thus resulting in control gaps, manual efforts and reduced customer satisfaction.
Financial institutions also need to be aware of external developments and what data points can be obtained from reliable and trusted databases. A recent development driven by policy makers across Europe is the requirement to set up ultimate beneficial ownership registers in each European Union member country (introduced through the 5th EU AML Directive). This provides financial institutions with a chance to leverage government-held data in their customer onboarding activities and thus avoid having to request it from the customer. Commercial banks or banking associations are also closely looking at a more centralised approach to KYC data including developing national or regional KYC utilities (e.g. in Scandinavia).
Given the complexities of onboarding – third-party data collection, customer interactions, screening and risk-rating activities, document collection and storage, internal risk analysis, to name a few - dedicated technology tools and platforms have emerged to replace manual processes that in many organisations often still continue to support these activities.
Benefits of a technology-driven customer onboarding approach
There are many benefits financial institutions can earn from a holistic, technology-enabled end-to-end process approach.
Conclusion
Financial institutions have not only a lot to gain from digitising their onboarding activities, but could potentially lose out if they decide not to act and keep things as they are today.
At PwC, we support clients during various stages of their onboarding digitalisation initiatives, from vendor selection to technology integration and customisation. By leveraging our industry expertise, regulatory knowledge and technology capabilities, we support clients to understand and navigate the customer onboarding process innovations, no matter how big or small.
Our clients' recent success stories
Frequently, clients turn to PwC for help to enhance the effectiveness of their onboarding processes, to help them digitise their internal processes, or to help them define their remote customer onboarding proposition. Here are two recent examples of client success stories
Contact ou Financial crime team!
]https://www.fenergo.com/press-releases/aml-kyc-and-sanctions-fines-for-global-financial-institutions-reach-5-6-billion-mid-year/
Delete